Education Op/Ed

Letter to the editor: Starksboro info was misleading

Superintendent Reen continues to mislead and scare MAUSD voters.

In the July 28 Addison Independent article, “Voters weigh the cost of Starksboro’s exit,” a quote attributed to Reen mentions only tax impacts if Starksboro withdraws from the district, but neglects to mention tax impacts if Starksboro doesn’t withdraw. In short: the impacts are nearly the same either way.

Independent financial analysis indicates that the education tax rate in FY24 for MAUSD is estimated to increase over FY23 under either scenario: 4.3% if Starksboro remains in the district and 5.7% if it is out of the district.

Moreover, this very small difference (1.4%) translates to just $20 in additional tax per $100K of assessed property value — which, after income-sensitivity adjustments are applied, will be reduced or eliminated for roughly 2/3 of families.

Voters should have accurate financial information to inform their vote, not one-sided and misleading scare tactics. Visit Starksboro Save Our Schools to learn more at tinyurl.com/Starksboro-SOS .

Jeanne Albert

Lincoln

Share this story:

More News
Op/Ed

Editorial: Vermont adopted its bias-free policing policy for good reasons

“Costella’s decision to summon Border Patrol directly violates Vermont’s Fair and Impartia … (read more)

Op/Ed

Ways of Seeing: Raise your voice at the ballot box

“Every decision about leadership counts.”

Op/Ed

Editorial: Kudos for passage of CHIP

“Adequate housing is an essential priority of any community striving for a viable economic … (read more)

Share this story: