Login
Skip to content

Vermont House approves recreational marijuana bill

  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 1118.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_field::query() should be compatible with views_handler::query($group_by = false) in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_field.inc on line 1148.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_sort::options_validate() should be compatible with views_handler::options_validate($form, &$form_state) in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_sort.inc on line 165.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_sort::options_submit() should be compatible with views_handler::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_sort.inc on line 165.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_sort::query() should be compatible with views_handler::query($group_by = false) in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_sort.inc on line 165.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_validate() should be compatible with views_handler::options_validate($form, &$form_state) in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 599.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::query() should be compatible with views_handler::query($group_by = false) in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 599.
  • strict warning: Non-static method views_many_to_one_helper::option_definition() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter_many_to_one.inc on line 25.
  • strict warning: Non-static method views_many_to_one_helper::option_definition() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter_many_to_one.inc on line 25.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_query::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_query.inc on line 181.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 136.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 1118.
  • strict warning: Declaration of image_attach_views_handler_field_attached_images::pre_render() should be compatible with views_handler_field::pre_render($values) in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/image/contrib/image_attach/image_attach_views_handler_field_attached_images.inc on line 112.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_area::query() should be compatible with views_handler::query($group_by = false) in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_area.inc on line 81.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_area_text::options_submit() should be compatible with views_handler::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_area_text.inc on line 121.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 1118.
  • strict warning: Non-static method views_many_to_one_helper::option_definition() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter_many_to_one.inc on line 25.
  • strict warning: Non-static method views_many_to_one_helper::option_definition() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter_many_to_one.inc on line 25.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_style_default::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/addison/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_style_default.inc on line 24.

Posted on January 8, 2018 |
By ALAN J. KEAYS of VTDigger.org



MONTPELIER — The Vermont House passed a bill Thursday to legalize the recreational use of marijuana, defeating a host of amendments, including one that likely would have cost the governor’s support.

The House vote came on the same day that U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions rescinded a policy that shielded states with legalized marijuana from federal action.

The House passed H.511 by a vote of 81 to 63 on Thursday. It legalizes the possession of 1 ounce or less of marijuana and two mature and four immature marijuana plants by people 21 or older.

Addison County representatives voted as follows:

Yes: Rep. Fred Baser, R-Bristol; Peter Conlon, D-Cornwall; Robin Scheu, D-Middlebury; David Sharpe, D-Bristol; Amy Sheldon, D-Middlebury.

No: Diane Lanpher, D-Vergennes; Terry Norris, I-Shoreham; Harvey Smith, R-New Haven; Warren Van Wyck, R-Ferrisburgh.

House Judiciary Chair Maxine Grad, D-Moretown, said the bill was “an important criminal justice milestone.” She added that it removes criminal consequences for the “responsible” use of marijuana by adults.

The bill seems well on its way to becoming law. Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Sears, D-Bennington, said Thursday night he expected the bill would hit the Senate floor and gain approval as early as Wednesday.

The Senate passed essentially the same legislation in June, and the governor has said he would sign it.

Rep. Brian Savage, R-Swanton, spoke on the floor shortly after news broke about Sessions’ action. Savage called for putting off a vote on the measure until Jan. 18, which is when a commission established by Gov. Phil Scott is expected to offer recommendations regarding marijuana legalization.

Savage’s suggestion met the same fate as other amendments offered throughout the day, failing to gain the support needed to pass.

Rep. Kurt Wright, R-Burlington, said he didn’t see the need to rush the legislation through on the second day of the session. He said there were many much more important matters to address, including a projected 9.4 cent increase in the statewide property tax.

“What is the rush and the stampede to do this?” he asked, adding the message that is being sent to Vermonters is: “Never mind the 9.4 cent tax increase that you’re facing, we’re going to let you smoke a doobie. Maybe when you smoke a joint you won’t feel that 9.4 cents as much.”

Debate on the House floor began around 10 a.m. and didn’t end until 6 p.m. There was about a three-hour break to make way in the chamber for Scott to deliver his State of the State address.

The discussion was at times lighthearted or serious, other times moving or testy. Opponents questioned the effect legalization would have on highway safety and said it sent the wrong message to the state’s youth about the use of marijuana.

Supporters called it a “cautious” and “conservative” approach to legalization, stopping short of creating a full tax-and-regulate retail approach.

“Substance use should be treated as a health care matter, not a crime,” Rep. Rob Cina, P-Burlington, said as the debate drew to a close. “Let this be another step toward the end of the war on drugs.”

The vote Thursday capped a fast-paced two days for the legislation at the start of the 2018 legislative session. The House Judiciary Committee on the session’s first day advanced the bill, then moved on to acting on a slew of amendments.

Supporters of the bill appeared steadfast in their effort to ensure the legislation advances without any substantial changes that could endanger support from the governor.

Scott has said he would sign the bill, following his veto last session of a measure that also would have legalized the possession of small amounts of marijuana and permitted the cultivation of a few plants.

In vetoing that legislation, the governor suggested ways it could be changed to gain his support.

The latest legislation, H.511, was a compromise reached by the heads of the Senate and House Judiciary panels and Scott’s administration just prior to a one-day veto session in June.

To address some of the concerns the governor raised, the bill creates criminal penalties for using pot in a vehicle with children and increases penalties for providing marijuana to anyone underage.

However, despite having reached a compromise, a move to take up the legislation in the one-day veto session failed to gain the needed support.

The effort by the bill’s supporters to avoid tweaking the legislation and retain the governor’s support resulted in an interesting twist during the afternoon session Thursday.

That’s when House Minority Leader Don Turner, R-Milton, who has opposed marijuana legalization, proposed an amendment that would create a tax-and-regulate structure.

Turner said “the writing was on the wall” and the “wheels had been greased,” clearing the path for marijuana legalization. It would be better, he said, to do it through a tax-and-regulate structure than through H.511, which he called the “worst possible” way of legalizing pot.

With a tax and some regulations, he said, money could be raised to help pay for “prevention, education, and countermarketing programs” as public safety initiatives.

“This amendment is my attempt to make a bad bill better,” he said, adding that it wasn’t a political maneuver but a recognition that he lost.

His measure called for retail marijuana to be taxed at 25 percent, with the first legal marijuana sales by licensed retailers on July 1, 2019. In its first year, he estimated that $15 million to $20 million could be raised through the tax.

Also, Turner’s proposal would have allowed a municipality to prohibit “a marijuana establishment” by a majority vote at an annual or special meeting.

Supporters of H.511 countered that now wasn’t the right time to adopt such a tax-and-regulate system and that attaching it as an amendment wasn’t the right method.

Sears said he didn’t expect a tax and regulate structure to gain approval this session, though he added he supported that method of marijuana legalization over the one outlined in H.511.

“I think that basically we’ll be looking at next year, I don’t think there’s enough support in the House to pass it,” Sears said of the tax and regulate system. “I’m hopeful that in 2019 whoever is in the Legislature will move forward with a tax and regulate system.”

A marijuana legalization commission appointed by the governor isn’t expected to issue its final report on the subject until Dec. 15, seven months after the session closes and a month after the election season.

Connect with us