Op/Ed
Letter to the editor: Telephone Gap project targets old growth trees
My concern is the Telephone Gap project plans, primarily in Rutland County, of the Green Mountain National Forest and the public comment period that ends on April 8. Old growth forest stands are extremely rare in this publicly-owned forest and it is not being managed to promote them in any significant way. At this point in time we need old forest to sequester and store carbon to slow climate change.
Early successional forest created by cutting, releases CO2, not only in the road building/improving, cutting, transporting, and manufacturing or burning of the wood, but also after the cut in the rotting of roots and soil organisms. We need maximum sequestration and storage of carbon now, not in twenty plus years after cut stands regrow.
Let the “old”, “mature”, “late successional” (confused yet?!) stands keep growing into old growth on public land rather than tax subsidized logging. The No Action alternative plan would do this best and be of the most public good. Log on private lands where 95% of the logging is done in Vermont and on the thousands of acres of already approved logging in GMNF. If you are concerned, please make an official comment at tinyurl.com/m8uyf5ye
Alan Coulter
Weybridge
More News
Op/Ed
Editorial: Gov. Scott finally objects to Trump’s illegal tactics
This week, Phil Scott finally sided with a majority of Americans when he expressed caution … (read more)
Op/Ed
Legislative Review: Most 2025 bills fail to satisfy
So far this year, the Vermont House has passed 65 bills. Some, including money bills, supp … (read more)
Op/Ed
Jessie Raymond: ‘Around the Bend’ and into the sunset
Lately, I’ve been asking myself a question: When is it time for a small-town humor columni … (read more)