Op/Ed

Letter to the editor: Proposition 5 is vague, dangerous and unnecessary

All of us want our health care decisions kept between us and our doctors. These are the professionals that know us and that we have come to respect and trust with our care. I do not want any “compelling State interest” to make decisions for me regarding my health care.

Before you vote on Proposition 5, Article 22 on Nov. 8, I ask you to read the proposal you are voting on, including all the words, without bias or preconceived ideas. Please consider that the word “individual” can be either male or female, at any age. And if there’s any question on who’s reproductive rights would be affected, the courts would decide whether the father’s or the mother’s wishes would be honored.

Because of the purposely vague wording of this proposal, and current laws already in effect, this constitutional change is dangerous and unnecessary. Please vote No.

Barbara Buskey R.N.

Addison

Share this story:
More News
Op/Ed

Editorial: Is Vermont more or less affordable under Gov. Scott?

Gov. Scott blames others, but he’s the guy with the full-time paycheck and the one person … (read more)

Op/Ed

Ways: of seeing: Togetherness in dance, song and silence

“I’m a group person. Not the exclusive kind of cliques that offer an empty status, but rat … (read more)

Op/Ed

Legislative Report: Sen. Hardy reflects on legislation pushing education reform

The Legislature adjourned last week after passing major legislation to advance the transfo … (read more)

Share this story: