Op/Ed

Letter to the editor: Proposition 5 is vague, dangerous and unnecessary

All of us want our health care decisions kept between us and our doctors. These are the professionals that know us and that we have come to respect and trust with our care. I do not want any “compelling State interest” to make decisions for me regarding my health care.

Before you vote on Proposition 5, Article 22 on Nov. 8, I ask you to read the proposal you are voting on, including all the words, without bias or preconceived ideas. Please consider that the word “individual” can be either male or female, at any age. And if there’s any question on who’s reproductive rights would be affected, the courts would decide whether the father’s or the mother’s wishes would be honored.

Because of the purposely vague wording of this proposal, and current laws already in effect, this constitutional change is dangerous and unnecessary. Please vote No.

Barbara Buskey R.N.

Addison

Share this story:

More News
Education Op/Ed

Editorial: Vt. education commission faces tough nuts to crack

The task for the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont is straightforwar … (read more)

Op/Ed

Community Forum: Inequities give rise to oligarchy

Today, while 60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, three multi-billionaires own more … (read more)

Op/Ed

Community Forum: Ideas for reducing the tax burden

Taxes have a bad rap. In part, this is because we never discuss who pays which taxes. Taxe … (read more)

Share this story: