Op/Ed
Letter to the editor: Nuclear power void looms
The rejection of the proposed Manchester solar array that Bill McKibben highlights (“‘Offensive and shocking:’ We better come to terms with solar panels soon”) is frustrating but relatively unimportant. The now-closed Vermont Yankee nuclear plant provided the equivalent of roughly 5,000 such solar installations, all equipped with a correspondingly immense battery backup system to provide baseload power around the clock and throughout the year. And that’s not counting the energy — largely provided by coal plants in China — required to manufacture all of those panels and batteries, along with the carbon-capturing trees that would need to be cleared to make space for them. With more plant closures planned in the U. S. and around the world, what we really need to come to terms with is nuclear power.
Noah Graham
Bristol
More News
Op/Ed
Taking credit for other’s work: Dems led Vermont’s tax reductions; Scott signed the bill
“The Governor’s claim that such tax relief is due to the presence of more Republican legis … (read more)
Op/Ed
Meta’s settlement admits social media’s harm to teens
Meta was the first social media company to settle with the states.
Op/Ed
We need to define growth’s endgame vs. status quo
If we don’t change the current trajectory, the impact on the community continues to worsen … (read more)










