Op/Ed

Letter to the editor: Nuclear power void looms

The rejection of the proposed Manchester solar array that Bill McKibben highlights (“‘Offensive and shocking:’ We better come to terms with solar panels soon”) is frustrating but relatively unimportant. The now-closed Vermont Yankee nuclear plant provided the equivalent of roughly 5,000 such solar installations, all equipped with a correspondingly immense battery backup system to provide baseload power around the clock and throughout the year. And that’s not counting the energy — largely provided by coal plants in China — required to manufacture all of those panels and batteries, along with the carbon-capturing trees that would need to be cleared to make space for them. With more plant closures planned in the U. S. and around the world, what we really need to come to terms with is nuclear power.

Noah Graham

Bristol

Share this story:

More News
Op/Ed

Editorial: Middlebury selectboard’s hugely important upcoming decision

As with any vacancy at the top of an operation, the first question to ask is whether the j … (read more)

Op/Ed

Ways of Seeing: Has debate debacle destroyed Dems or emboldened them?

I don’t think it’s that people are concerned that Biden would do his job poorly, the quest … (read more)

Op/Ed

Letter to the editor: Biden’s health should deter him from reelection bid

I am a lifelong Democrat and have been a steady supporter of Joe Biden in the coming presi … (read more)

Share this story: