Op/Ed

Letter to the editor: Concern over S.100 unfounded

Regarding John Moyers’ editorial of March 23: He described an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) in Bristol that was 2,400 square feet and larger than the main house. He feared that Senate Bill 100 would allow such buildings with no more oversight than that which would be required for a single-family house. But the bill also defines an ADU as “a distinct unit that is clearly subordinate to a single-family dwelling … and does not exceed 30 percent of the total habitable floor area of the single-family dwelling or 900 square feet, whichever is greater.” The Bristol zoning code says that an ADU shall not exceed “the greater of 30 percent of the total habitable floor area of the single-family dwelling or 1,000 sq. ft.”

So even if S100 passes, an ADU that’s bigger than the main house would not get an automatic green light in Bristol or anywhere else. If Bristol approved this gigantic ADU, they were not complying with their own zoning.

Chris Robbins

Middlebury

Share this story:
More News
Op/Ed

Editorial: 12% is shocking, but don’t let the number fool you

“Just half of the projected [property tax] increase is due to anticipated increases in hig … (read more)

Op/Ed

Community Forum: Libraries can help improve our health care

“Turning local libraries into telehealth hubs [can give] residents a familiar, trusted pla … (read more)

Op/Ed

Ways of Seeing: Together we accomplish the most

“Our strength is in our ability to work together to meet needs and solve problems.”

Share this story: