Op/Ed

Letter to the editor: Concern over S.100 unfounded

Regarding John Moyers’ editorial of March 23: He described an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) in Bristol that was 2,400 square feet and larger than the main house. He feared that Senate Bill 100 would allow such buildings with no more oversight than that which would be required for a single-family house. But the bill also defines an ADU as “a distinct unit that is clearly subordinate to a single-family dwelling … and does not exceed 30 percent of the total habitable floor area of the single-family dwelling or 900 square feet, whichever is greater.” The Bristol zoning code says that an ADU shall not exceed “the greater of 30 percent of the total habitable floor area of the single-family dwelling or 1,000 sq. ft.”

So even if S100 passes, an ADU that’s bigger than the main house would not get an automatic green light in Bristol or anywhere else. If Bristol approved this gigantic ADU, they were not complying with their own zoning.

Chris Robbins

Middlebury

Share this story:

More News
Op/Ed

Editorial: Vote yes, with thanks for an Ilsley project done well

It’s not often that residents of any town can gladly approach a significant bond issue kno … (read more)

Op/Ed

Living Together: Don’t stereotype the homeless

Houseless or unhoused gives no respect for the experience or depth of pain of someone who … (read more)

Op/Ed

Ways of Seeing: Cultivating fixes for local problems

When I look at the world it’s easy to feel heartbroken and paralyzed at the chaos. Granted … (read more)

Share this story: